홈 > 연구소 > 논문 / 학술활동
연구소
마마파파&베이비의 핵심인 베이비 드림 난임 연구소는
그간의 연구학술 성과에 안주하지 않고,
늘 한계를 뛰어넘기 위해 노력합니다.
2013년 유럽불임학회(ESHRE) P-166 Thawing in the day of embryo transfer had improved pregnancy rate in HRT cycles, but not in the natural cycles. (동결란 이식에서 호르몬 주기법인 경우 당일 해동 후 이식하는 것이 좋은 임신율을 보이지만 자연배란주기법인 경우는 차이가 없다.)
S.G. Kim1, J.H. Lee1, Y.Y. Kim1, H.J. Kim1, I.H. Park1, H.G. Sun1, K.H. Lee1, H.J. Song2
1 Mamapapa&baby Obstetrics Gynecology Clinic, Infertility Lab., Ulsan city, Korea South
2 BuCheon Seoul Women's Hospital, BuCheon City, Korea South
What is the optimal thawing time in day 3 frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET)during natural and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) cycles?
Immediate embryo transfer after thawing in the morning had improved pregnancy rate compared with thawing in the evening 1 day before embryo transfer in HRT cycles.
Embryo-endometrial synchronization seems to be improved by control of thawing day in FET cycles. However, the optimal timing for thawing still remains uncertain.
In a retrospective study, the relationship between thawing time and pregnancy rate has been studied in 678 FET cycles between Jan 2008 and Dec 2011.FET cycles were divided into four groups according to thawing time and endometrium preparation methods.
Embryos which were thawed evening 1day before ET were cultured overnight and transferred the next day morning (group A:in natural cycle(n=160), group B:in HRT cycle (n=277)), while embryos from thawed in the morning were transferred within 3h (group C:natural cycle (n=138), group D:in HRT cycle (n=103)).
There were no differences among four groups in patient age (group A: 34.7±4.0, group B: 34.7±4.5, group C: 33.9±3.5and group D: 34.2±4.2), the mean number of transferred embryos (2.2±0.4, 2.1±0.4, 2.5±0.5and 2.1±0.3), the mean number of cryopreserved embryos (9.4±4.8, 10.9±6.2, 10.9±5.9 and 11.3±5.6), endometrial thickness (10.4±1.9, 10.3±2.0, 9.9±1.5 and 10.1±1.6) and embryo quality. The mean embryo survival index before transfer was comparable in the four groups (72.4%, 71.7%, 70.6% and 71.4%p=0.30). The clinical pregnancy rates in natural cycles were no significant difference between group A (28.1%) and group C (37.7%, p=0.19). However, the clinical pregnancy rates in HRT cycles were significantly higher in group D (50.5%) than group B (31.0%, p<0.01).
The number of cycles between each group was different. In particular, the number of HRT cycles was small.
In our results, the overall pregnancy rate in FET cycles had improved in immediate embryo transfer after thawing in the morning. Especially, pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the HRT cycles. We do not know the exact reason for the high pregnancy rate in the HRT cycles. Probably, it seems that better embryo-endometrial synchronization was achieved in HRT cycles.